Activities For Learner-Centered Teaching

Activities for

Learner-Centered Teaching

Effective Teaching and Learning Department

1050 West Bristol Rd.

Flint, MI 48507

Contact Information

Effective Teaching and Learning Department

Website:

http://www.baker.edu/departments/etl/main.cfm

Overview of Packet Contents

Background Information

2…………………... Learner-Centered Teaching: Becoming a Lifelong Learner

3…………………... Using Active Learning Strategies in Learner-Centered Teaching

4…………………... Critical Thinking Takes Students Deeper in Their Learning

5…………………... The Importance of Reflection in Learning

6…………………... Asking Better Questions Improves Learning

6…………………...Generic Question Stems

7…………………... Suggestions for Using Learning Activities

8…………………... Models for Evaluating Student Performance in Learning Activities

9…………………... Index of Learning Activities Grouped by Learning Strategy

10…………………. Index of Learning Activities (Alphabetically)

11-32…………… Activities

Appendices

33………………… Appendix A – Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of Critical Thinking

34………………… Appendix B – Background on Using Problem-Based Learning Activities

35………………… Appendix C – Summary of Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs)

39………………… Appendix D – Class Session / Unit Design Template

40-43…………… References and Additional Resources

Learner-Centered Teaching: Becoming a Lifelong Learner

A paradigm shift is occurring in education: The shift from the teacher being the “center of the classroom” to a primary focus on whether or not the student is learning. One article refers to the teacher’s role as changing from being the “sage on the stage, to the guide on the side.” (King, 1993) In learner-centered teaching, the responsibilities of both the teacher and the learner change, with the ultimate goal of the student becoming a “lifelong learner.” Note: This paradigm shift will require change for both the students (who are used to being told everything) and the teachers (who are used to telling students what they need to know).

Learner-centered teaching focuses attention squarely on learning: what the student is learning, how the student is learning, the conditions under which the student is learning, whether the student is applying the learning, and how current learning positions the student for future learning.

· When teaching is learner-centered, the action focuses on what the students (not the teachers) are doing….This learner-centered orientation accepts, cultivates, and builds on the ultimate responsibility that students have for their own learning.

· When teaching is learner-centered, content is used, not covered.

· Course content / curriculum is not the end; it is the means to the end.

· Don’t assume that because teachers have taught, that students have learned.

· This is not only about how teachers need to become learner-centered teachers, but also teaching the students to become learner-centered learners.

The paradigm shift to learner-centered teaching can be summed up with the following seven principles, as discussed in Learner-Centered Teaching by Maryellen Weimer:

Principle 1: Teachers Do Learning Tasks Less

Learners do more of:

· Organizing the content

· Generating the examples

· Asking the questions

· Answering the questions

· Summarizing the discussion

· Solving problems

· Constructing diagrams

Principle 2: Teachers Do Less Telling; Students Do More Discovering

This is “messier,” in that classrooms may be “louder,” it may take longer for students to “get” concepts, and the teacher learns new teaching methods. Students progressively take more responsibility for their learning through discovering, and “uncovering” what they need to know.

Principle 3: Teachers Do More Design Work (of activities and learning experiences)

Effective assignments and activities, which are designed to help students:

· Increase learning skills (learning “how to” learn)

· Motivate student involvement and participation

· Discover work that is related to the discipline/real world

· Develop content knowledge, learning skills, and awareness

Principle 4: Faculty Do More Modeling

Demonstrate for students how an expert approaches a learning task, and how you problem solve.

Principle 5: Faculty Do More to Get Students Learning from and with Each Other

Use collaborative activities and cooperative groups for learning.

Principle 6: Faculty Work to Create Climates for Learning

Create learning environments conducive to students taking responsibility for their own learning.

Principle 7: Faculty Do More with Feedback

Feedback is not just about grades, but also informal and helps students learn from mistakes.

(Weimer, 2002)

Using Active Learning Strategies in Learner-Centered Teaching

So, if lecture is not the primary instructional method, what is? Learner-centered teaching utilizes “active learning strategies,” often referred to as “experiential learning.” Learners are regularly presented with tasks, whether it be problems to solve, opportunities to discuss, hands-on projects, simulations, etc. IMPORTANT: Don’t do an activity “just to do” an activity. It should be connected in some way to the learning that you want to occur, whether it’s specific to the Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) or critical thinking skills. Always tie it back to the learning.

Kolb’s Model of Experiential Learning provides one of the foundations for this model of how learning occurs in the classroom. Note that it is an ongoing cycle of learning (not only for the student, but also for the teacher!):

Kolb’s Model of Experiential Learning (Kolb, 1984)

This model of learning follows these steps:

Action / Activity- The learner performs some type of activity related to the lesson or subject.
Reflection- The learner reflects about what they did and what happened as a result of their activity. This can be in one of several forms: free writing, journaling, or small or large group discussions.
Knowledge/theory- The learner uses the results of the reflection to develop knowledge and theories, which helps further the learning process because the learner is conceptualizing their own theories, not just accepting the theory of the instructor.
Planning- Based on the learner’s theories, they plan what to do next and anticipate the results of further activity. This process moves the learner into the higher levels of thinking than merely recall/recite facts or information.

Critical Thinking Takes Students Deeper in Their Learning

Employers are looking for graduates who can problem-solve, know how to work in teams, are flexible, have strong interpersonal skills, and who can use “higher level thinking.” We want students to move from “surface-level” learning to “deep learning,” which is a facet of being a lifelong learner. Learner-centered teaching focuses on developing critical thinking skills, by intentionally challenging the students to do more than just recall facts and figures. When was the last time your boss asked you to complete a multiple-choice task?

The most common framework used to explain deeper levels of critical thinking is the one developed by Benjamin Bloom, in 1956. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives described and explored six levels of critical thinking in the cognitive domain. In 2001, this taxonomy was revised by Anderson and Krathwohl, incorporating new knowledge. Essentially, the six levels of critical thinking include:

Remembering:

Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Understanding:

Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.

Applying:

Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing.

Analyzing:

Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.

Evaluating: Making judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing.

Creating:

Putting elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning, or producing.

Within learner-centered teaching, a major emphasis should be to help students progress in their critical thinking skills. In Appendix A, a chart is provided that further describes each level of critical thinking, along with verbs that can be used in assignments, projects, and discussions, along with potential student “products” that will require the use of the various levels of critical thinking.

The Importance of Reflection in Learning

In Kolb’s model above, reflection is one of the crucial steps of learning. Without reflection, learning doesn’t occur. Again, this is not about how to “memorize and recall” information. It’s about connecting, integrating, and synthesizing experiences, information, thoughts, and feelings with real-life application. Reflection is the bridge between what “happens” and how it gets applied in life. In helping students develop critical thinking skills, reflection is essential. The question then becomes “How?” The answer is: “In a number of ways.”

You will have some students in your classroom who will need to reflect internally. Often categorized as “introverts,” these learners need to process their information through thinking, journaling, and by themselves. In other words, introverts “think to speak.” Contrast this with the extroverts, who struggle to process information unless they are doing it externally, and with other people. They often think as they talk (and sometimes talk before they think…), whereas introverts will typically think about an answer for a while before they speak (if they share at all). In other words, they “speak to think.” You will be able to quickly observe who is who in your class, based on who is typically answering questions versus who does not typically initiate an answer. And you yourself probably fit into one of the two categories. Neither is the “best” way, but combined, this poses a challenge for a teacher: How to engage both introverts and extroverts in your class in the practice of reflecting on their learning?

Tips for engaging introverts and extroverts in discussion and reflection:

· Know your own preference!

· Address this issue with your students. Ask them to identify where they would categorize themselves.

· Ask the students to identify how they best can be engaged (provide a way for introverts to write their answers down!).

Introverts		Extroverts
· Provide discussion / reflection questions ahead of time · Allow time for them to think, reflect before they answer · When facilitating class or group discussion, make sure you “check in” with introverts to get their input before the discussion moves on · Provide “reflection breaks”		· It’s okay to allow extroverts to “process” or think out loud; encourage them to do this quietly in pairs or threes to give introverts space to think · May need to coach extroverts to not share as quickly, to let others have time to process · Give opportunity for them to “think out loud” on paper before verbalizing it

We have provided a list of discussion / debriefing / reflection activities in this packet. Note especially those activities listed in the “Journaling” and “Reflection / Debriefing” sections of the index.

Note: Reflection is a discipline that is good for faculty as well as students. Do you practice reflection on your teaching and on your own learning?

Asking Better Questions Improves Learning

Often the biggest challenge is to know how to ask better questions. It’s easy to get caught in using “Yes / No” and “closed-ended” questions. And students are used to getting these! Unfortunately, they usually don’t yield quality discussions or reveal if learning has actually occurred.

An open-ended question is designed to encourage a full, meaningful answer using the subject's own knowledge and/or feelings. It is the opposite of a closed-ended question, which encourages a short or single-word answer. Open-ended questions also tend to be more objective and less leading than closed-ended questions. Keep in mind that you may want to have discussion questions in pairs or small groups (4-5), to get more students involved in the discussion. Pairs or groups can then “report out” to the rest of the class.

Open-ended questions typically begin with (or imply) words such as "Why" and "How", or phrases such as "Tell me about..." Often they are not technically a question, but a statement which implicitly asks for a response. Examples:

Closed-ended Question s Open-ended Questions

How many kids are in your family? Tell me about your family.

Do you hope to get a job after your graduate? Describe the kind of job you would like.

Did you get the answer right? How did you get to that answer?

In Appendix A, you’ll find a list of verbs that correspond to the levels of critical thinking. These can be used to craft open-ended discussion, reflection, and assessment questions. An example of how to use these critical thinking verbs is in the following list of generic question stems. Keep this list handy! Generic question stems serve a variety of purposes. That can be provided to students as an aid in developing review or discussion questions, or they can be used to generate questions as part of an activity or for student reflection. (Adapted from King, 1995 and Endres, 2003)

Generic Question Stems

· Compare … and … with regard to…

· Describe … in your own words.

· Do you agree or disagree with this statement…? What evidence is there to support your answer?

· Explain how...

· Explain why....

· How are … and … similar?

· How could …be used to …?

· How does ... affect...?

· How does … apply to everyday life?

· How does … tie in with what we learned before?

· How does...apply to everyday life?

· Summarize … in your own words.

· What are the implications of...?

· What are the strengths and weaknesses of …?

· What do we already know about...?

· What do you think causes …? Why?

· What does … mean?

· What is … analogous to?

· What is a counter-argument for …?

· What is a new example of …?

· What is another way to look at …?

· What is the best … and why?

· What is the counter argument for...?

· What is the difference between … and …?

· What is the meaning of...?

· What is the nature of …?

· What is the solution to the dilema of …?

· What is...analogous to?

· What would happen if …?

· Why is … happening?

· Why is … important?

Suggestions for Using Learning Activities

Keep in mind that doing activities “just to do activities” will not aid the learning process. Different activities are useful for different purposes in teaching, but some activities can be used for more than one purpose. More complex activities and or combinations of activities will take longer than the minimum suggested time. Keep in mind that the activities can be modified, combined with other activities, and /or tailored to meet your specific goals. Make sure that the activity has a purpose directly tied to the content being taught. As you plan, here are some things to keep in mind:

First, determine what concept(s) you are trying to teach. (What do you want them to learn?)
Second, determine how you will know if the concept has been learned?
Then, determine which activity (or activities) will best help teach that concept.

(Adapted from Wiggins and McTighe, 2005)

Characteristics of good activities should:

Relate to one or more learning outcomes or critical thinking skills. (PURPOSE)
Be appropriate for the learning outcomes. (For example, it is very difficult for a student to practice dilema solving on a multiple-choice test.)
Motivate and engage students.
Integrate assessment and feedback. (ALWAYS REFLECT)
Facilitate transfer to real world applications.
Require students to make decisions based on facts, information, logic, and/or reasoning (Duch, 2001)
May require students to determine what information is needed and/or what steps or procedures need to be taken (Duch, 2001)
May be given in stages with additional information in the second or later stages (Duch, 2001)
Be complex enough to engage whole group directly. (Duch, 2001)
Include the appropriate informational resources to support the learner such as lecture, textbook, research materials, and so on.

Depending on the use of a specific activity, it may not meet all of these characteristics. For example, an activity used to assess prior student knowledge may not meet the criteria of practice with learning content and transfer to real world application. The same may be true of a content activity used in place of a lecture as a way for students to generate the learning content.

Finally:

A. Be creative.

B. Be flexible.

C. Do your own “reflection” after the activity to assess for its effectiveness, what you would change, how you might use it again in the future.

Models for Evaluating Student Performance in Learning Activities

One of the challenges of using active learning techniques is what role they play in evaluating student performance for purposes of determining a grade. Not all learning activities need to be used as part of the student’s grade. However, if a significant part of the class work involves active learning, this should be reflected in student grades. In some instances, students maybe more motivated if the work will be graded. Grading presents several challenges, especially for group activities.

In an active learning environment, just like the real world, we can learn the most from our mistakes. Students need the freedom and safety to make mistakes without fear of the impact on their course grade.

In group projects, just like in real life, students are often confronted by the “free-rider” dilema of a group member who does not contribute but shares in the group rewards. Advanced planning can reduce this concern by employing a grading system that provides individual as well as group accountability.

Writing assignments and other projects could be quickly graded using a system of minus

(-), check (√), and plus (+). The minus symbol can be used to denote work that does not meet all standards, the check that the work is acceptable, and the plus for work that demonstrates excellence. For grading, these marks can be translated into points such as 0 for no work, 1 for a minus, 2 for a check, and 3 for a plus. Points from all journals or other work can then be totaled and integrated into the course grade.

Here are some models for how to approach grading of learning activities to consider:

Participation: Students receive participation credit for participating in an activity
Mastery Learning: Students are required to demonstrate mastery of an activity before receiving credit. (No one wants to fly with the pilot who has not mastered landings!)
Credit/No Credit: Students receive a score based on whether or not they achieved a minimum set of standards defined in advance by the instructor. This mitigates the challenge of comparing two or more student projects.
Rubrics: A rubric provides a detailed breakdown of what the criteria are for performance and what the different levels of performance are. This allows the assignment of a different grade for different projects in a way that is clear, fair, and objective to the students.
Journals/Progress Reports: Individual or group reflection reports can be used to assess the level of student learning and thinking that is occurring as well as different levels of involvement in a group project.
Presentations: A group or individual can be graded on the presentation of a project rather than the project itself.
Individual Assignments: For a group project, each individual can be required to produce their own project first as the basis for at least partial grading. The group then synthesizes the individual efforts into a common project.

Learning Activities Grouped by Learning Strategy

The following are suggested categories to get you started. You may discover that different activities have more than one use and application of teaching strategy.

Learning Strategy Possible Activities

Check for Understanding (Ways to review material; can be graded or not graded. Emphasis is on “Have students learned?”)	Background Knowledge Probe Comparative Advance Organizer Concept Review Data Analysis Defining Features Matrix Directed Paraphrasing Exam Preparation Journals Focused Free Writing Frame Sentence Futuring	Index Card Match One Minute Paper / Muddiest Point Quiz Show Reconsidering Scavenger Hunt Think / Write / Pair / Share Three Step Interview Visible Quiz What? So What? Now What?
Classroom Assessment Technique (CAT) (Similar to Check for Understanding; can be more formal) See Appendix C for 50 CATs	Concept Review Data Analysis Defining Features Matrix Directed Paraphrasing	Index Card Match One Minute Paper / Muddiest Point Question Creation
Critical Thinking (Helping students develop higher order thinking skills)	Analytic Memo Article Abstract Categorizing Grid Concept Map Defining Features Matrix Failure Analysis	Futuring Guided-Discovery Learning Metacognition Pro and Con Grid Question Creation Role Play
Discussion (Engages students in learning through interaction with each other and the material)	Academic Controversies Class Discussion Fishbowl Pairs Check Pass a Problem Pro and Con Grid	Question Creation Rotating Trio Round Table Think / Write / Pair / Share Three Step Interview
Journaling (Opportunities to reflect through writing)	Contemporary Issues Journals Double Entry Journal Focused Free Writing	Frame Sentence Open-Ended Journals Semi-structured Journals
Problem-based Learning (For a more in-depth discussion on Problem-based Learning, see Appendix B)	Activity Matrix Barnga Concept Map Failure Analysis Futuring Guided-Discovery Learning	Jigsaw Metacognition Pairs Check Pass a Problem Role Play
Reflection / Debriefing (Reflecting on the learning that is taking place, and connecting to future learning)	After Action Review Concept Review Double Entry Journal Focused Free Writing Laboratory Notebook	Open-Ended Journals Pairs Check Round Table What? So What? Now What?

Learning Activities Indexed Alphabetically

Academic Controversies……………………….…11

Activity Matrix………………………………………...12

After Action Review………………………………...12

Analytic Memo…………………………………….….13

Article Abstract……………………………….……….13

Background Knowledge Probe…………………13

Barnga…………………………………………………….14

Categorizing Grid…………………………………....16

Class Discussion……………………………………….16

Comparative Advance Organizer………….….16

Concept or Mind Map…………………….………..17

Concept Review……………………………….………18

Contemporary Issues Journals……….…………18

Data Analysis………………………………….………..18

Defining Features Matrix………………….……..19

Directed Paraphrasing………………………….….19

Double Entry Journal………………………….…….20

Exam Preparation Journals……………….……..20

Failure Analysis……………………………….……….21

Fishbowl………………………………………….……….21

Focused Free Writing…………………….…………21

Frame Sentence…………………………….…………22

Futuring…………………………………………………...22

Guided-Discovery Learning / Student Research………………………………………23

Guided Journals……….………………………………….22

Index Card Match…………………………………………23

Jigsaw…………………………………………………………..24

Laboratory Notebook……………………………………24

Listening Teams……………………………………………25

Metacognition (Thinking About Thinking)…….25

One Minute Paper / Muddiest Point…………….26

Open-Ended Journals……………………………………26

Pairs Check…………………………………………………..26

Pass a Problem……………………………………………..27

Pro and Con Grid…………………….…………………….27

Question Creation………………………………………..28

Quiz Show (aka Jeopardy)…………………………….28

Reconsidering………………………………………………28

Role Play………………………………………………………29

Rotating Trio………………………………………………..29

Roundtable…………………………………………………..30

Scavenger Hunt…………………………………………….30

Semi-structured Journals……………………………...30

Think / Write / Pair / Share…………………………..31

Three Step Interview…………………………………….31

Visible Quiz…………………………………………………..32

What, So What, Now What?............................32

ACTIVITIES

Note: Wherever possible, sources are cited for the listed activities.

Academic Controversies
Category:	Discussion
Suggested duration:	30 minutes
Intent:	Enables students to understand different points of view on a dilema and practice representing a position.
Implementation:	1. Select an issue that has two or more well defined positions such as pro and con. 2. Pair up students and assign each pair a position. 3. Assign each pair the following tasks: a. Research and learn your assigned position’s supporting arguments and information using instructor provided resources, the textbook, library resources, and additional resources as appropriate. b. Prepare a persuasive presentation in support of your position. 4. Group pairs so that each group has one pair representing each position. 5. Have each pair present their position to the others in their group. 6. Provide times for the groups to discuss their opposing positions including asking challenging questions, asking for data to support opposing positions, and providing counter arguments. 7. Have the pairs switch positions so that they now represent the opposing viewpoint as effectively as they can. Students should add additional information and identify what the strong points are in each viewpoint’s position. 8. Assign each group the task of creating a report that synthesizes all perspectives. Students should no longer advocate for any position, but work together to reach consensus and appreciate the value of all sides. The report should identify the strongest arguments for all sides and present a consensus viewpoint supported by facts and data. All group members should sign the akibat report to show their agreement. 9. Give a quiz that covers all perspectives to evaluate individual understanding of the perspectives. 10. Students should review how well the groups functioned and what could be improved for working through other controversies.
Source:	Johnson and Johnson, 1994
Notes:

Activity Matrix
Category:
Suggested duration:	Ongoing, throughout a class session as appropriate
Intent:	Allows students to map activity, applications, tools, processes, methods, etc. to why/when to use particular items.
Implementation:	1. In the first column, the students list the activity, etc. 2. In the second column the students list why/when to use the activity, or how it would be applied in a real-life situation.

Example:

Activity / Application / Method etc.	Description	When to Use

After Action Review
Category:	Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	10-15 minutes
Intent:	An alternative structure for group reflection and debriefing after an activity. (Similar to What? So What? Now What?)
Implementation:	Have students review events leading to the activity. Have students give a brief statement of the specific activity. Have students summarize the key events. Have students restate portions of their part of the activity. Encourage participation. Do not turn it into a critique or lecture. The following will help: § Ask why certain actions were taken. § Ask how they reacted to certain situations. § Ask when actions were initiated. § Ask leading and thought provoking questions. § Exchange "war stories" (lessons learned). § Ask students what happened in their own point of view. § Relate events to subsequent results. § Explore alternative courses of actions that might have been more effective. § When the discussion turns to errors made, emphasize the positive and point out the difficulties of making tough decisions. Summarize. Allow teams to discuss the events in their teams. Follow up on areas that need more review or practice.
Source:	(Adapted from) Department of the Army, 1993
Notes:	Especially well suited for use after dilema based learning activities.

Analytic Memo
Category:	Critical Thinking
Suggested duration:	Assignment
Intent:	Students write a one- or two-page analysis of a specific dilema or issue to help inform a decision-maker.
Implementation:	1. Select which analytic methods or techniques you wish to assess. 2. Locate or create a typical dilema or situation for the students to analyze, including the required background information (or requiring them to research it). 3. Develop an assignment sheet that explains the student’s role in writing the memo, the identity of the audience, the specific subject to be addressed, the analytic approach to be used, the length required (usually 1-2 pages), and the assignment deadline.
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993
Notes:

Article Abstract
Category:	Critical Thinking
Suggested duration:	Assignment
Intent:	Provides active strategy for students to read and analyze articles in the discipline.
Implementation:	1. Instructor selects an important article from the discipline being studied. 2. Students write a summary or abstract of the article.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:

Background Knowledge Probe
Category:	Check for Understanding, Classroom Assessment Technique
Suggested duration:	5-10 minutes
Intent:	To identify the student’s current knowledge on a particular topic. Most often used as an activity to activate the learning process.
Implementation:	1. Prepare two or three open-ended questions or a few short-answer questions that will probe the students’ existing knowledge of the subject or topic. 2. Students can submit two-three sentence answers to each question. 3. Collect these papers and review the student answers before covering the topic.
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993
Notes:	· The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity. · This could also be done in pairs or groups

Barnga
Category:	Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	45-80 minutes (Be sure to leave enough time to debrief)
Intent:	To have students learn more about non-verbal communication, teamwork, personal biases, and intercultural awareness / diversity.
Implementation: Materials Needed (each table): · Copy of rules · Deck of cards (no face cards) · Poker chips or other “token” (paper clips, toothpicks, popsicle sticks, etc.)	1. Arrange the room so that there are separate places for each group (approximately 4 to 5 students per group) to play cards. 2. Set a copy of the rules and a deck of cards (A-10 only, no face cards) at each table. 3. Let the students play a few rounds to get used to the rules at the table, with talking allowed at each table. 4. Then remove the rules from each table, but continue to allow talking. Walk around to each table, ensuring that each group understands the rules at that table. From now on, the winner of each trick will receive one poker chip (or token of your choice) BUT TALKING IS NOW PROHIBITED. 5. After allowing a few rounds without talking, make the participant who won the most tricks move clockwise to the next table, and the participant who won the least number of tricks move counter-clockwise to the next table. 6. Play continues at the new tables for a set number of minutes or rounds (WITH NO TALKING). It is up to the participants at the tables to figure out how to communicate to each other and which rules are correct. What the players DO NOT KNOW, is that each table has been playing with a different set of rules (see below). Depending on the number of groups, you may choose to discard or alter the rules as you see fit. Table 1: Ace high, no trump Table 2: Ace low, diamonds trump Table 3: Ace low, clubs trump Table 4: Ace high, hearts trump Table 5: Ace high, spades trump Table 6: Ace low, no trump In all cases, other cards will be worth face value—10 high, 2 low Each table shares the following rules (ADD the table-specific rules to each table’s set of rules; remember- they don’t know it’s different at each table!): · Players are dealt 5 cards each · Whoever wins the most tricks will move clockwise to the next table · Whoever loses the most tricks will move counter clockwise to the next table · Everyone else stays at the same table · Ties are resolved by paper rock scissors · Each round will be about 5 minutes long (longer if time allows) and each round will consist any number of games that the time allows. · After the initial round, players will not be allowed to see the rules or speak to each other. Gestures and pictures are allowed, but players are not allowed to use words. · The game “winner” will be the person who has won the most tricks in total. (Of course, once game play starts, winning will likely take a back seat to trying to figure out what everyone else is doing, as they are playing by different rules.) · Players can keep track of scores with popsicle sticks (one stick per trick won). · The dealer can be anyone at the table, the person who plays first will be to the right of the dealer . · The first player for each trick may play ANY suit. All other players must follow suit (play a card of the same suit). For each round, each player plays one card. · If a player does not have that suit, a card of any suit must be played. The trick is won by the person with the HIGHEST card of the ORIGINAL suit (players will begin to become confused when some players believe their card is trump, and others disagree or contradict this).
Source:	http://www.lancs.ac.uk/users/interculture/pcat6.htm and http://www.cirhomepage.org/speech/speeches/the_barnga.doc Adapted from Thiagarajan and Steinwachs 1990
Notes:	The debriefing is the most important part of this game, so be sure to devote enough time to it. Below are some potential questions that you can use for this process. · If you could describe the game in one word, what would it be? · What did you expect at the beginning of the game? · When did you realize that something was wrong? · How did you deal with it? · How did not being able to speak contribute to what you were feeling?

Copy the rules below for each table; be sure to add their specific “rule” to the list, but don’t let them know it’s different!:

Table 1: Ace high, no trump

Table 2: Ace low, diamonds trump

Table 3: Ace low, clubs trump

Table 4: Ace high, hearts trump

Table 5: Ace high, spades trump

Table 6: Ace low, no trump

BARNGA RULES

· Players are dealt 5 cards each

· Whoever wins the most tricks will move clockwise to the next table when directed

· Whoever loses the most tricks will move counter clockwise to the next table when directed

· Everyone else stays at the same table

· Ties are resolved by “Rock, Paper, Scissors”

· Each round will be about 5 minutes long (longer if time allows) and each round will consist of any number of games that the time allows.

· After the initial round, players will not be allowed to see the rules or speak to each other. Gestures and pictures are allowed, but players are not allowed to use words.

· The game “winner” will be the person who has won the most tricks in total. Players can keep track of scores with popsicle sticks, toothpicks, poker chips, paper clips, etc. (one per trick won).

· The dealer can be anyone at the table; the person who plays first will be to the right of the dealer.

· The first player for each trick may play ANY suit. All other players must follow suit (play a card of the same suit). For each round, each player plays one card.

· If a player does not have that suit, a card of any suit must be played. The trick is won by the person with the HIGHEST card of the ORIGINAL suit.

Categorizing Grid
Category:	Critical Thinking
Suggested duration:	Ongoing in and/or out of class as appropriate
Intent:	To have students practice placing items into specific categories.
Implementation:	1. Select 2 or 3 similar categories 2. List several examples that fit into only one category. 3. Have students assign the examples to categories 4. Students explain their reasoning, either in small or large groups.
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993
Notes:

Class Discussion
Category:	Discussion
Suggested duration:	15-20 minutes
Intent:	To bring out different points of view or concepts from a learner-centered point of view.
Implementation:	1. Create a set of discussion questions you can pose to students. 2. Tell the students what the goal for the discussion is. 3. Ask the question and let the students answer/discuss/debate
Source:
Notes:	· Ensure that the discussion remains on track and that all of the goals for the discussion are met before ending the discussion. Teach the students to monitor the discussion to keep it on track. · The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Comparative Advance Organizer
Category:	Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	5-10 minutes
Intent:	Helps students learn new information in terms they already know. Prepares students for learning experience (lecture, reading, or activity) by presenting comparisons or analogies that connect the content either to familiar experiences or previously learned material.
Implementation:	· Instructor presents a brief (5-10 minute) introductory lecture to establish linkages to other material. · You can have students work to establish linkages to previous knowledge or material.
Source:
Notes:	· Can also be done with a concept map, an outline, or a student-generated list of questions or comments. · Related to Background Knowledge Probe
Concept or Mind Map
Category:	Problem-based Learning, Critical Thinking
Suggested duration:	10-20 minutes
Intent:	To have students identify a main concept and relating concepts about a particular topic in a visual manner. A concept map is a diagram showing the relationships among concepts. They are graphical tools for organizing and representing knowledge. Concepts, usually represented as boxes or circles, are connected with labeled arrows in a downward-branching hierarchical structure. The relationship between concepts can be articulated in linking phrases such as "gives rise to", "results in", "is required by," or "contributes to". The technique for visualizing these relationships among different concepts is called "Concept mapping".
Implementation:	On a white board or posted flip chart paper 1. Identify a main concept 2. Have students identify concepts that are related to the main concept. 3. Students should draw a line between related concepts a write the verb that relates the concepts on the connecting line. 4. Repeat this process connecting new concepts to the related concepts and so on.
Source:	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept_map
Notes:	An alternative approach is to have students prepare a list of concepts on sticky notes and organize the combined group of notes into a map of related concepts.

Example:

Concept Review
Category:	Check for Understanding, Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	5-20 minutes
Intent:	To allow students a chance to review concepts you have covered in a previous lesson or session.
Implementation:	1. Ask students to identify an example for each of the concepts/theories/topics covered in the lesson or questions they might have 2. Direct students to form pairs (or small groups) and review their answers with a partner and come to consensus on at least one correct answer for each question. 3. Ask students to share their answers with the entire class.
Source:
Notes:

Contemporary Issues Journals
Category:	Assignment
Suggested duration:	None (see below)
Intent:	Helps students link course content to current events and relevant periodicals.
Implementation:	1. Students read newspapers or other current periodicals (including discipline-specific journals) to write about how course content relates to real world events. 2. Students write a certain number of pages or for a certain time each week, answering specific questions posed by the teacher. 3. Could have students share their findings with class or groups.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:

Data Analysis
Category:	Check for Understanding, Classroom Assessment Technique
Suggested duration:	10-20 minutes
Intent:	Allow students to practice analyzing data and presentation skills.
Implementation:	1. Instructor provides students with raw data such as lists, graphs, or tables. 2. Students prepare an analysis of the data to present to class.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:

Defining Features Matrix
Category:	Classroom Assessment Technique
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes
Intent:	Assists students practice identifying what the significant features are of similar concepts.
Implementation:	1. Identify two concepts that have several similarities. Students can readily confuse the characteristics of key features or concepts that exhibit some similarities (e.g., hurricanes vs. tornadoes, Lincoln vs. Douglas, Picasso vs. Matisse). 2. List the important characteristics of the two concepts . These may include characteristics that are similar in both cases or different (or even absent in both cases). 3. Generate a matrix. The simplest matrix has two open columns on the right side that can be used by students to place a + (feature is present) or – (feature is absent) and a wider left-hand column with
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993 Also: http://www.uakron.edu/centers/cci/docs/CAT_defmatrix.pdf

Example:

Metamorphic Rocks Defining Features Matrix

Complete the table below by placing a check mark in the one or both of the two columns of the table

where appropriate. Identify which of the characteristics in the left hand column are present in rocks

formed by contact and/or regional metamorphism. Do not place a check mark in either column if the

characteristic is not present. One characteristic has been completed as an example.

Characteristic	Rocks
Characteristic	contact metamorphism	regional metamorphism
Formed at temperatures above 200 C	+	+
May originally have been an igneous rock	+	+
Form as a result of increasing pressures	-	+
May surround plutonic igneous rocks	+	-
Slate is an example	-	+
Formed as a result of melting	-	-

Directed Paraphrasing
Category:	Check for Understanding, Classroom Assessment Technique
Suggested duration:	5-20 minutes
Intent:	A quick way for the instructor to identify where the students are at in their understanding of a concept or idea.
Implementation:	1. Ask students to define what a particular concept means to them in 1 or 2 concise sentences. The definition should make sense to other students and the instructor. Another variation of this approach is to have students list as many words as they can think of related to a concept or idea. 2. The instructor engages students in quickly sorting responses into three categories: “okay,” “not quite,” “ no idea.” 3. Based on this feedback, the instructor can begin to tailor class presentations and activities to address student knowledge gaps or difficulties.
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993
Notes:	Similar to Background Knowledge Probe.

Double Entry Journal
Category:	Journaling, Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	Ongoing as appropriate
Intent:	This can be used for lectures, article reviews, videos, and other times when students are typically passive to make students more active and reflective.
Implementation:	1. Have students first create an outline of the critical points and ideas of the presentation in one column. 2. Have the students write a response to each point in the second column that addresses their reactions, feelings, and questions.
Source:	Millis and Cottell, 2003
Notes:	This is a great way to have students take notes, and reflect on their thinking and learning process.

Example:

Critical Points / Ideas / Concepts	Response (reactions, feelings, questions, etc.)

Exam Preparation Journals
Category:	Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	Ongoing as appropriate
Intent:	Provides an opportunity for students to reflect on the course and prepare for course exams.
Implementation:	1. At the start of the course, the instructor provides students with a list of essay questions that the midterm and akibat exams will be drawn from. 2. As the class progresses, students work out answers to the questions in their journals.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:	· The instructor may allow the students to use their journal during the exam, or review the journals during the exam and assign bonus points based on the quality of the journal. · The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Failure Analysis
Category:	Critical Thinking, Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	30-90 minutes (more if assigned as a group project outside of class)
Intent:	To have students work through a dilema backwards, identifying why a solution or dilema failed and determine solutions that will work.
Implementation:	1. Provide students with a case study or scenario that presents the topic with an analysis of how it failed. 2. Have students research the scenario or case study. 3. Direct students to start from the failure and analyze the situation or scenario from the failure to identify the main causes of the failure. 4. Ask students to write a paper or make a presentation about why the scenario or case study failed and how it could have been avoided.
Source:
Notes:	· Can use the What? So What? Now What? To guide the analysis

Fishbowl
Category:	Discussion
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes
Intent:	To have a small group of students discuss an issue, topic, reading, etc. with other students observing and eventually joining the discussion.
Implementation:	1. Select 3-4 students and have them bring their chairs to the front of the room 2. Give the students a topic to discuss amongst themselves for 5-10 minutes as the class observes 3. Before the discussion winds down, ask for volunteers from the audience to take a spot in the main discussion circle 4. Give the students a new topic or allow the new participant to share their views on the previous discussion 5. Repeat as desired
Source:	Silberman, 1995
Notes:	You can also conduct this activity as a multiple group activity, separating the students into 3 or 4 groups and having the entire group switch places to take the discussion in a new direction, etc. You may also want to consider giving more complex questions as the discussions continue.

Focused Free Writing
Category:	Journaling, Reflection / Debriefing, Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	5-20 minutes
Intent:	Can be used if students either have nothing to say or everyone wants to talk. Can also be used to summarize lecture and or reading by having students summarize main points of lecture, what they have learned, what does not make sense to them, the “muddiest point,” or what questions they have.
Implementation:	1. Instructor assigns a general topic to write on. 2. Students write nonstop for a period of time (such as 15 minutes). Don’t worry about revision, punctuation, spelling, grammar, etc. 3. Students turn in writing at the end of the session
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:	Fifteen minutes should yield a page, but it could be longer.

Frame Sentence
Category:	Journaling, Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	5-15 minutes
Intent:	Provides focus and starting point for student writing and analysis.
Implementation:	1. Instructor provides students with an opening frame sentence for the start of a new paragraph or short essay. 2. Students complete the paragraph or essay with supporting details and/or generalizations.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:

Futuring
Category:	Check for Understanding, Critical Thinking, Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	30-90 minutes (more if used as an out of class activity as well)
Intent:	Allows students to forecast possible future scenarios based on existing conditions.
Implementation:	1. Instructor selects a current condition or musim and asks the students to consider the following questions: a. What are the underlying causes that created this trend? b. How likely is it that those causes will stay the same, increase, or decrease in the future? c. What new developments might alter the trend? d. If this musim changes, intensifies, or decreases, what impacts will it have? 2. Students use their answers to these questions to develop scenarios of what the future will look like in a specified time frame.
Source:	http://www.joe.org/joe/2004june/comm2.shtml
Notes:	Can be done individually, in groups, or as whole class. Can also combine with Concept Map.

Guided Journals
Suggested duration:	Ongoing as appropriate
Intent:	Provides an opportunity for students to reflect on the course and on particular concepts identified by the instructor.
Implementation:	1. Instructor provides very specific questions related to the content that week. 2. Students write a certain number of pages or for a certain time each week answering specific questions posed by the teacher. 3. Could have students share their findings with class or groups.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:	The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Guided-Discovery Learning / Student Research
Category:	Critical Thinking, Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	30-90 minutes (more if used as an out of class activity as well)
Intent:	Makes the students responsible for discovering course content rather than an instructor presentation.
Implementation:	1. The instructor identifies key resources, background information, and most importantly, provides a set of “guided” critical thinking questions to the student. These questions are written with an understanding of what critical thinking is needed to process the information and construct knowledge. 2. Critical thinking questions are provided in a certain sequence, starting with directed questions, followed by questions with a specific answer, with questions that can have multiple answers last. These questions provide assistance in guiding students’ thought processes toward the production of knowledge at the appropriate level of attainment. 3. Students do their own research (individually or in a group) to locate the information rather than have the instructor pre-select a reading or a lecture. 4. Students may be required to present to the rest of the class their findings.
Source:	Apple and Krumsieg, 2000
Notes:	The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Index Card Match
Category:	Classroom Assessment Technique, Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes
Intent:	To review course concepts or to prepare for an exam
Implementation:	1. Create index cards containing concepts, theories, terminology, etc. and then on a matching card, write the definition of that item 2. Combine the two sets of cards and shuffle thoroughly 3. Have the students draw a single card and explain that some students have definitions and others have the theories, concepts, etc. that match the definition cards 4. Direct the students to find their match and then sit together without identifying to others what item they have 5. Have the students quiz the rest of the group on the topic by reading aloud the definition or giving an example of the item.
Source:	Silberman, 1995
Notes:	· You can develop cards that are missing one word out of a sentence while the corresponding card contains the missing word. · You can also create an example card with multiple solutions and have the students form groups instead of pairs (i.e. “What is an example of a way to give good customer service?”) and when they quiz the group, they can obtain multiple answers to the question.

Jigsaw
Category:	Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	30-90 minutes (more if used as an out of class activity as well)
Intent:	Allows students to either teach each other new content or review content.
Implementation:	1. Divide students into groups and assign each group a portion of the content to be reviewed/presented. 2. The first groups review the material and plan how to teach the material to the other groups (preparation groups). 3. Create new groups with one member from each of the first groups (now called a teaching or presentation group). 4. In the second groups, each group member presents the material they covered in the preparation groups.
Source:	http://www.jigsaw.org/steps.htm, http://www.jigsaw.org/overview.htm http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr324.shtml
Notes:	You will probably want to give the preparation groups some guidelines for what they need to teach in the presentation groups (i.e. identify the 3-5 most important topics from the chapter or the important points of a theory, etc). You may also want to use color coded stickers given to each member of the preparation group to make the formation of the presentation group easier. Another variation on this activity is to reconvene the preparation groups to allow the students to share what they learned in their other groups.

Laboratory Notebook
Category:	Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	Ongoing as appropriate
Intent:	Enables the students to reflect on what is occurring during an experiment or dilema solving exercise.
Implementation:	1. In one column students record what they observed or experienced in a lab or demonstration situation. 2. In the second column, the student records their thinking and reflections. They address why they did something or what the results indicate to them.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:	Similar to Double Entry Journal. This approach could also be used with solving a math dilema or other type of problem.

Listening Teams
Category:	Check for Understanding, Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes after a short lecture, video, presentation
Intent:	To help students stay focused and alert during lecture, video, presentation
Implementation:	1. Assign students to one of four roles: a. Questioner – students who will ask at least 2 questions about the lecture after it is complete b. Team Player – students who will identify 2 areas of agreement with the lecture content and explain why c. Devil’s Advocate – students who will identify 2 areas of disagreement with the lecture content and explain why d. Example Giver – students who will give example or specific applications of the content 2. Give your prepared lecture, video, presentation 3. Group the roles together (all questioners, all team players, etc.) and give 10 minutes to formulate their responses to their assigned tasks 4. Break the students into groups containing one of each role and allow them time to discuss their questions, examples, etc.
Source:	Silberman, 1995
Notes:	You can also conduct this activity as a large group session, by reconvening the group after the teams have had time to formulate their responses and discussing each item as a large group.

Metacognition (Thinking About Thinking)
Category:	Critical Thinking, Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	Ongoing
Intent:	To have students express and document their thinking and dilema solving processes.
Implementation:	1. Have students talk through and develop a description of how to go about solving a specific problem. One context for this is to tell the students that they need to teach this to someone else who knows even less than they do. 2. Provide students with a sample of how an expert would approach the dilema or the commonly accepted way of going about solving this problem. (Don’t tell the students that they were wrong, because in the end they may have reached the same destination. The focus is on the process.) 3. Have students discuss how and why their approach differed from the expert approach. 4. Have students identify how they would go about solving these types of problems in the future.
Source:
Notes:

One Minute Paper / Muddiest Point
Category:	Check for Understanding, Classroom Assessment Technique
Suggested duration:	2-5 minutes
Intent:	To identify the student’s current knowledge on a particular topic. Most often used as an activity (Background Knowledge Probe) at the beginning OR end of a learning experience.
Implementation:	1. Identify a question you want the students to answer relating to the topic or concept you are about to teach or after you have taught. 2. Give the students a sheet of paper and allow them to write as much as they know about the topic in a defined amount of time. 3. Collect these papers and review the student answers before covering the topic. 4. ALTERNATE OPTION: Ask students what the “muddiest point” is, or what is still unclear to them about _________________.
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993
Notes:	· You can also use this as a reflection activity after you have completed the instructional. You can give the students back their original Background Knowledge Probe and ask them to review it and make any changes to it so that they can visibly see the differences occurring as a result of the learning experience. · The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Open-Ended Journals
Category:	Journaling, Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	Ongoing
Intent:	To allow students an open place for reflection and commentary
Implementation:	1. The student chooses what to address about their learning such as what they read, summarize lectures, raise questions, apply learning to personal experience, or any other topic related to the class. 2. Students write a certain number of pages or for a certain time each week.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:

Pairs Check
Category:	Discussion, Problem-based Learning, Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	5-20 minutes
Intent:	Allows students to review work with a peer and forces students to communicate thinking to another.
Implementation:	1. Pairs of students complete the same problems individually. 2. Students compare answers. 3. Students discuss and amend any differences.
Source:	Millis and Cottell, 2003
Notes:

Pass a Problem
Category:	Problem-based Learning, Discussion
Suggested duration:	20-60 minutes (depending on the number of groups you allow to review each problem)
Intent:	Identify and solve a dilema related to course content.
Implementation:	1. Divide students into small groups. 2. Have each group spend up to 10 minutes identifying a dilema (or you can give them a dilema to solve). 3. Have that group of students brainstorm and write down their solutions to the problem. Allow up to 10 minutes for this. 4. Have the groups pass their dilema / solution to another group for review and then the second group can add to the original solutions. 5. Continue until all groups have had a chance to see/solve each problem. 6. Have the group that generated the dilema initially review all solutions and either pick the best one or create a new one that synthesizes two or more of the solutions.
Source:
Notes:	You can also do this by posting flip chart papers on the walls around the room (one per problem) and have the groups rotate.

Example (on full sheet of paper):

Problem
Possible Solutions

Pro and Con Grid
Category:	Critical Thinking, Discussion
Suggested duration:	None
Intent:	Allows students to practice identifying the pros and cons of an issue.
Implementation:	1. Select a decision, judgment, dilemma, or an issue 2. Write a prompt that will trigger pros and cons in relation to the issue or dilemma. 3. Let the students know how many pros and cons to list and whether you want words and phrases or complete sentences.
Source:	Angelo and Cross, 1993
Notes:	· A variation on this is to assign the students a perspective or role on the issue. · You can also have them determine the issue to be discussed

Example:

Issue:
Pros	Cons

Question Creation
Category:	Critical Thinking, Discussion
Suggested duration:	5-20 minutes
Intent:	To have students develop a set of questions related to class content or a problem.
Implementation:	1. Have students brainstorm possible questions related to course content 2. Have students select 2-3 best questions and explain why these each question is a good question.
Source:
Notes:	· The Generic Question Stems on page can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity. · You could use this to generate potential questions for projects, exams, Checks for Understanding, etc.

Quiz Show (aka Jeopardy)
Category:	Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	30-60 minutes
Intent:	Technique for reviewing course material using groups.
Implementation:	1. The students develop their own questions in a group or individually. 2. The instructor or students group(s) the questions into categories and assigns point values. 3. The instructor serves as an emcee for a quiz show using the questions and awarding points to the teams that answer the questions correctly.
Source:	Millis and Cottell, 1998
Notes:	The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Reconsidering
Category:	Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	10-20 minutes, at the beginning and end of a class, session or chapter
Intent:	Technique for allowing students to write about what they think something will be beforehand, then go back afterward and reassess their feelings about the item after they have completed it.
Implementation:	1. Before a course, a chapter, or before a major project, ask the student to write their views on the item answering possible questions such as: a. What makes a good project? b. What is the value of __________ topic? c. What advice would they give themselves to be _______ ____ d. What solutions could they devise to a dilema you will pose at the end of the chapter or unit? 2. Collect these papers, but tell students that you are not going to grade them. 3. At the end of the course or unit, go back and ask the same question again, asking the students write for the same amount of time. 4. Hand students their original papers for comparison, so they can see how their views have become more sophisticated over time
Source:	Silberman, 1996
Notes:	Can be used with Background Knowledge Probe

Role Play
Category:	Problem-based Learning, Critical Thinking
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes (can be longer)
Intent:	To have students act out, in pairs, small or large groups, a topic or concept from the class
Implementation:	1. Provide roles, positions, or perspectives to students or groups of students; assist with assigning roles or clarification as needed. 2. Direct students to research their topic or role and allow the students enough time to work through how they want to perform the simulation. 3. Have the students perform the role-play.
Source:
Notes:	· You can also provide a scenario or case and require students to negotiate or find a solution based on their role. · You can pair students so that everyone is involved in a role play at the same time. You can also add a third student as an observer of each pair to provide feedback to the role players. · The important portion of this activity is the reflection / debriefing afterward. Some suggested questions you can prime the audience to consider while the students are conducting the role play are: What did the participants do well? What could they have done better? What are other possible solutions to this issue? You can also use the What? So What? Now What? debriefing activity.

Rotating Trio
Category:	Discussion
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes
Intent:	To have students discuss issues with many different students
Implementation:	1. Form groups of three students 2. Direct the students to assign numbers to each group member (1, 2, or 3) 3. Distribute a set of questions for the group to discuss and set a time limit (10 minutes) for the discussion 4. Call time after the discussion dies down or the time limit has been reached 5. Direct the #1s to stay put and raise their hands 6. Direct the #2s to move to the group on their left 7. Direct the #3s to move to the group on their right 8. Distribute another (more complex) set of discussion questions building upon the first set for the new group to discuss 9. Rotate trios in this manner as many time as desired
Source:	Silberman, 1995
Notes:

Roundtable
Category:	Discussion, Reflection
Suggested duration:	10-20 minutes
Intent:	To allow the students a chance to identify solutions to a dilema or issue in a more reflective manner than traditional brainstorming.
Implementation:	1. Have students form groups (optional) 2. Ask the students to write their idea for a solution to the problem/issue/concept/topic on a sheet of paper. 3. Let them know that it is okay to pass if they don’t have a solution at that time (but only allow a certain number of “passes”) 4. Direct students to read their solution to the group before passing the paper to another student (this saves everyone from having to read what others have written) 5. Pass the next person and repeat.
Source:	Silberman, 1995
Notes:

Scavenger Hunt
Category:	Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	10-30 minutes
Intent:	Provides an opportunity for students quickly review a concept, chapter, or syllabus to identify important points.
Implementation:	1. Instructor provides a set of scavenger hunt questions 2. Students, either alone or in groups, go through the designated material to locate the requested information.
Source:	http://www.qesn.meq.gouv.qc.ca/cc/inclass/scavenge.htm
Notes:	Scavenger hunts can be excellent tools for having students practice the skill of quickly skimming for pertinent information, but can also be used as an advance organizer or classroom assessment tool to determine which topics students had problems with and allow the instructor to focus more on these activities.

Semi-structured Journals
Category:	Journaling
Suggested duration:	Ongoing as appropriate (see below for additional suggestions)
Intent:	Provides an opportunity for students to reflect on the course or on a particular concept identified by the instructor.
Implementation:	1. Instructor provides a set of generic questions to initiate the student’s writing. 2. Students write a certain number of pages or for a certain time each week.
Source:	Bean, 1996
Notes:	The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Think / Write / Pair / Share
Category:	Discussion, Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	5-15 minutes
Intent:	To allow students a chance to formulate an opinion on a topic and then share that opinion with others.
Implementation:	1. Pose a question or dilema to your students 2. Direct students to spend a few minutes answering the item on their own 3. Direct students to pair up with someone and share their answers to the dilema or topic 4. Debrief this activity by asking students to share what they heard that was interesting, not their original answer.
Source:
Notes:	· You can use this as a paired activity that moves into increasingly larger groups to eventually reach a group consensus on a topic or issue. · The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Three Step Interview
Category:	Discussion, Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	20-40 minutes
Intent:	To identify a dilema or issue for discussion.
Implementation:	1. Part One: a. Pair the students or allow them to select a partner. b. Give them time to decide who will be the interviewer and who will be the interviewee. c. Allow them two minutes to do an interview using a set of instructor developed questions d. After two minutes, switch roles 2. Part Two: a. Form a group of four by joining another pair. b. Interviewers present what you learned from your interviewees 3. Part Three: Debriefing (5 minutes) a. Reach consensus on what is the best example of an answer to the selected question identified in your group interviews. b. Identify a spokesperson to share this finding with everyone.
Source:
Notes:	· You can use this activity as a precursor to the Pass a Problem activity to help define the problems to be discussed. · The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

Visible Quiz
Category:	Check for Understanding
Suggested duration:	10-20 minutes
Intent:	To allow review of material from reading, prior knowledge, or prior to a test.
Implementation:	1. Instructor prepares questions or have students prepare questions in advance on PowerPoint slides. (Alternate: Have students prepare questions) 2. Students are divided into groups and each group given a set of cards marked A, B, C, D, T, and F for multiple choice and true/false answers. 3. Instructors pose question and students respond as a group by displaying the appropriate letter for their answer
Source:
Notes:	The Generic Question Stems can be used as a starting point for generating questions for this activity.

What, So What, Now What?
Category:	Reflection / Debriefing
Suggested duration:	10-20 minutes
Intent:	A three step process to allow to debrief an activity or experience, and discuss ways to incorporate into future experiences (similar to After Action Review)
Implementation:	1. What? The discussion begins by essentially asking, “What has happened?” or “What’s been going on?” The What? phase pertains to the substance of your experiences. It is intended to elicit descriptive responses about facts and occurrences. 2. So what? The So What? phase pertains to the impact of the experience on the participants themselves. It looks at the consequences of recent occurrences and tries to make sense of them. The participants are asked to abstract and generalize what they are learning, shifting from the descriptive into the interpretive. 3. Now What? The akibat phase of the discussion, the Now what? phase, involves taking the lessons learned from the experience and reapplying them to other situations and the larger picture. This includes considering not only the participants’ plans for their next activity or expereince, but also how they can apply all of this knowledge and experience to other realms of their lives (e.g., as family members, friends, citizens).
Source:	Adapted from EarthForce.org and other sources
Notes:

Appendix A

Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy to Create Critical Thinking Focused Activities & Assignments

Level & Definition	Actions	Verbs	Potential Student Products
Remembering: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.	recognizing, listing, describing, identifying, retrieving, naming, locating, finding	draw, identify, locate, label, select, write, outline, list, recite, name, record, state, repeat	quiz, definition, fact, worksheet, test, label, list, workbook, reproduction; events, recordings, dictionary, TV shows, text reading, magazine articles
Understanding: Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.	interpreting, exemplifying, summarizing, inferring, paraphrasing, classifying, comparing, explaining	confirm, explain, convert, infer, discuss, relate, match, describe, estimate, paraphrase, predict	recitation, summary, collection, explanation, show and tell, example, quiz, list, label, outline; analogy, graph, speech, collage, drama, poster, story, photo, cartoon, diagram
Applying: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing.	implementing, carrying out, using, executing	apply, modify, build, construct, solve, report, sketch, produce	illustration, simulation, sculpture, demonstration, presentation, interview, performance, diary, journal; diagram, photo, forecast, illustration, list, project, puzzle, cartoon, Powerpoint
Analyzing: Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.	comparing, organizing, deconstructing, attributing, outlining, structuring, integrating	analyze, sort, categorize, investigate, compare, debate, differentiate, examine	survey, database, mobile, abstract, report, graph, spreadsheet, checklist, chart, outline; syllogism, model, conclusion, argument broken down, questionnaire
Evaluating: Making judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing.	checking, hypothesizing, critiquing, experimenting, judging, testing, detecting, monitoring	solve, critique, criticize, appraise, assess, conclude, justify, judge	debate, panel, report, evaluation, investigation, verdict, conclusion, persuasive speech; editorial, conclusion, valuing, self-evaluation, group discussion, recommendation, court trial, survey
Creating: Putting elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning, or producing.	designing, constructing, planning, producing, inventing, devising, making	combine, compose, design, generate, invent, plan, formulate, originate, devise, revise, hypothesize	film / video, story, project, plan, new game, song, media product, advertisement, painting; poem, play, article, book, invention, experiment, cartoon, set of rules, principles or standards

Appendix B

Problem-Based Learning
Category:	Problem-based Learning
Suggested duration:	30-90 minutes (more if used as an out of class activity as well)
Intent:	Students apply knowledge learned through individual or group dilema solving.
Implementation:	1. Choose a central idea, concept, or principle in the course. List the learning objectives related to this concept that students should meet when they work through the problem. 2. Think of a real world context for the problem. Develop a story or case around the problem. Add complexity and ill-structured qualities to limit the ability of students to adopt a “plug and chug” approach. 3. Structure and plan the problem: a. What will the first stage look like? What open-ended questions can be asked? What learning issues should be identified? b. How long will the dilema be? How many stages? How much in and out of class time? c. What information will students receive in second and later stages as they work through the problem? d. What resources will students need? Will the students need to do additional research on their own? e. What end product will students produce at the completion of the problem? 4. Write a guide for using the dilema in class. Plan for mini-lectures, class discussion, and small group reporting to support the dilema solving process.
Source:	Duch, 2001, http://www.udel.edu/pbl/; Jonassen, 2000; http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/problearn.html, http://www.samford.edu/pbl/
Notes:	The problems that you provide to the students can come in a variety of forms Logical Problems: apply logic to solving a puzzle Algorithms: apply a formula or series of steps Rule-Using Problem: apply rules Story Problems: a textual description of a dilema told as a story Decision-Making Problems: make a decision Troubleshooting: determine what is wrong with a situation Diagnosis-Solution Problems: determine how to treat/respond to a situation Strategic Performance: perform a complex skill or task Situated Case-Policy Problems: analyze a case scenario Design Problems: design and develop a product to meet specifications Dilemmas: resolve an issue with two or more opposing perspectives Also, a set of problems can be considered analysis problems such as: · Identify and order the sequential steps of a process · Characterize a set of phenomena by their component elements · Identify causes leading to an event or the consequences derived from an event · Break an event into problems and the actions taken to solve them and the problems these actions created · Determine cause and effect · Examine parts of a whole and their relationships · Determine the similarities and differences of a place, event, or people · Break into and identify parts

Appendix C

50 Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATS)

Source: Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993) Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Techniques for Assessing Course-Related Knowledge & Skills

I. Assessing Prior Knowledge, Recall, and Understanding

The CATS in this group are recommended to assess declarative learning, the content of a particular subject.

1. Background Knowledge Probe: Short, simple questionnaires prepared by instructors for use at the beginning of a course or at the start of new units or topics; can serve as a pretest; typically elicits more detailed information than CAT2.

2. Focused Listing: Focuses students’ attention on a single important term, name, or concept from a lesson or class session and directs students to list ideas related to the “focus.”

3. Misconception/Preconception Check: Focus is on uncovering prior knowledge or beliefs that hinder or block new learning; can be designed to uncover incorrect or incomplete knowledge, attitudes, or values.

4. Empty Outlines: In a limited amount of time students complete an empty or partially completed outline of an in-class presentation or homework assignment.

5. Memory Matrix: Students complete a table about course content in which row and column headings are complete but cells are empty.

6. Minute Paper: Perhaps the most frequently used CAT; students answer two questions:

What was the most important thing you learned during this class? And what important question remains unanswered?

7. Muddiest Point: Considered by many as the simplest CAT; students respond to one question (What was the muddiest point in _________ ?); well suited to large, lower division courses but not to those which emphasize integration, synthesis and evaluation.

II. Assessing Skill in Analysis and Critical Thinking

The CATS in this group focus on analysis—the breaking down of information, questions, or problems to facilitate understanding and dilema solving.

8. Categorizing Grid: Students complete a grid containing two or three overarching concepts and a variety of related subordinate elements associated with the larger concepts.

9. Defining Features Matrix: Students categorize concepts according to presence or absence of important defining features.

10. Pro and Con Grid: Students list pros/cons, costs/benefits, advantages/disadvantages of an issue, question or value of competing claims.

11. Content, Form, and Function Outlines: In an outline form, students analyze the “what” (content), “how” (form), and “why” (function) of a particular message (e.g. poem, newspaper story, billboard, critical essay); also called “What, How, & Why Outlines.”

12. Analytic Memos: Students write a one- or two-page analysis of a specific dilema or issue to help inform a decision-maker.

III. Assessing Skill in Synthesis and Creative Thinking

The CATS in this group focus on synthesis—each stimulate the student to create, and allow the faculty to assess, original intellectual products that result from a synthesis of course content and the students’ intelligence, judgment, knowledge, and skills.

13. One-Sentence Summary: Students answer the questions “Who does what to whom, when, where, how, and why?” (WDWWWWHW) about a given topic and then creates a single informative, grammatical, and long summary sentence.

14. Word Journal: involves a two-part response; first, the student summarizes a short text in a single word and second, the student writes 1-2 paragraphs explaining the word choice.

15. Approximate Analogies: Students simply complete the 2nd half of an analogy—a is to b as x is to y; described as approximate because rigor of formal logic is not required.

16. Concept Maps: Students draw or diagram the mental connections they make between a major concept and other concepts they have learned.

17. Invented Dialogues: Students synthesize their knowledge of issues, personalities, and historical periods into the form of a carefully structured illustrative conversation; two levels of invention (select and weave quotes from primary sources or invent reasonable quotes that fit characters and context).

18. Annotated Portfolios: Students assemble a very limited number of examples of creative work and supplement with own commentary on significance of examples.

IV. Assessing Skill in Problem Solving

The CATS in this group focus on problem solving skills of various kinds—recognition of types of problems, determining principles and techniques to solve, perceiving similarities of dilema features and ability to reflect and then alter solution strategies.

19. Problem Recognition Tasks: Students recognize and identify particular dilema types.

20. What’s the Principle?: Students identify principle or principles to solve problems of various types.

21. Documented Problem Solutions: Students track in a written format the steps they take to solve problems as if for a “show & tell.”

22. Audio- and Videotaped Protocols: Students work through a dilema solving process and it is captured to allow instructors to assess metacognition (learner’s awareness of and control of thinking).

V. Assessing Skill in Application and Performance

The CATS in this group focus on students’ abilities to apply important knowledge—sometimes referenced as conditional knowledge—knowing when and where to apply what they know and can do.

23. Directed Paraphrasing: Students paraphrase part of a lesson for a specific audience, demonstrating ability to translate highly specialized information into language the clients or customers can understand.

24. Application Cards: Students generate examples of real-work applications for important principles, generalizations, theories or procedures.

25. Student-Generated Test Questions: Students generate test questions and model answers for critical areas of learning.

26. Human Tableau or Class Modeling: Students transform and apply their learning into “doing” by physically modeling a process or representing an image.

27. Paper or Project Prospectus: Students create a brief plan for a paper or project based on your guiding questions.

Techniques for Assessing Learner Attitudes, Values, and Self-Awareness

VI. Assessing Students’ Awareness of Their Attitudes and Values

The CATS in this group are designed to assist teachers in assessing students’ attitudes, opinions, values, and self-awareness within the course curriculum.

28. Classroom Opinion Polls: Students indicate degree of agreement or disagreement with a statement or prompt.

29. Double-entry Journals: Students record and respond to significant passages of text.

30. Profiles of Admirable Individuals: Students write a brief description of the characteristics of a person they admire in a field related to the course.

31. Everyday Ethical Dilemma: Students respond to a case study that poses a discipline-related ethical dilemma.

32. Course-related Self-Confidence Surveys: Students complete an anonymous survey indicating their level of confidence in mastering the course material.

VII. Assessing Students’ Self-Awareness as Learners

The CATS in this group are recommended to help students express personal goals and clarify self-concept in order to make a connection between the articulated goals and those of the course.

33. Focused Autobiographical Sketches: Students write a brief description of a successful learning experience they had relevant to the course material.

34. Interest/Knowledge/Skills Checklists: Students complete a checklist survey to indicate their knowledge, skills and interest in various course topics.

35. Goal Ranking and Matching: Students list and prioritize 3 to 5 goals they have for their own learning in the course.

36. Self-Assessment Ways of Learning: Students compare themselves with several different “learning styles” profiles to find the most likely match.

VIII. Assessing Course-Related Learning and Study Skills, Strategies, & Behaviors

The CATS in this group focus both student and teacher attention on the behaviors the student actually engages in when trying to learn.

37. Productive Study-Time Logs: Students complete a study log to record the quantity and quality of time spent studying for a specific course.

38. Punctuated Lectures: Students briefly reflect, then create a written record of their listening level of a lecture. Repeat twice in the same lecture and 2-3 times over two to three weeks.

39. Process Analysis: Students outline the process they take in completing a specified assignment.

40. Diagnostic Learning Logs: Students “write to learn” by identifying, diagnosing, and prescribing solutions to their own learning problems.

Techniques for Assessing Learner Reactions to Instruction

IX. Assessing Learner Reactions to Teachers and Teaching

The CATS in this group are designed to provide context-specific feedback that can improve teaching within a particular course.

41. Chain Notes: On an index card that is distributed in advance, each student responds to an open-ended prompt about his or her mental activity that is answered in less than a minute.

42. Electronic Survey Feedback: Students respond to a question or short series of questions about the effectiveness of the course.

43. Teacher-designed Feedback Forms: Students respond to specific questions through a focused feedback form about the effectiveness of a particular class session.

44. Group Instructional Feedback Technique: Students respond to three questions related to the student’s learning in the course.

45. Classroom Assessment Quality Circles: A group or groups of students provide the instructor with ongoing assessment of the course through structured interactions.

X. Assessing Learner Reactions to Class Activities, Assignments, and Materials

The CATS in this group are designed to give teachers information that will help them improve their course materials and assignments.

46. RSQC2 (Recall, Summarize, Question, Connect and Comment): Students write brief statements that recall, summarize, question, connect and comment on meaningful points from previous class.

47. Group-Work Evaluation: Students complete a brief survey about how their group is functioning and make suggestions for improving the group process.

48. Reading Rating Sheets: Students complete a form that rates the effectiveness of the assigned readings.

49. Assignment Assessments: Students respond to two or three open-ended questions about the value of an assignment to their learning.

50. Exam Evaluations: Students provide feedback about an exam’s learning value and/or format.

Source: Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993) Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Downloaded from http://www.uoregon.edu/ tep/resources/newteach/fifty_cats.pdf

Appendix D

Design Template for Class Session

Stage 1 – Desired Results
Established Goals

Understandings: Students will understand that…		Essential Questions

*Students will know…*		*Students will be able to…*

Stage 2 – Assessment Evidence
Performance Tasks		Other Evidence

Stage 3 – Learning Plan
WHERETO W (where it’s going, what’s expected) H (hook and hold interest) E (equip, explore, experience) R (opp. to rethink and revise) E (evaluate work) T (be tailored) O (be organized)

References and Additional Resources

Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993) Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Apple, D., Duncan-Hewitt, W., Krumsieg, K. and Mount, D. (2000). Handbook on Cooperative Learning. Corvallis, OR: Pacific Crest.

Apple, D. K. and Krumsieg, K. (2001). Curriculum Design Handbook. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest.

Bacon, D., Stewart, K., and Silver, W. (1999). Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher Can Make the Difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467-488.

Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging Ideas. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York, David McKary.

Boylan, H. R. and Saxon, D. P. (1999). Outcomes of Remediation. Prepared for The League for Innovation in the Community College. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.ncde.appstate.edu/reserve_reading/what_works.htm.

Boylan, H. R. (2002). What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education. Boone, NC: Continuous Quality Improvement Network with the National Center for Developmental Education.

Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Change Management Monitor. (2004). Scenarios and Futuring. Retrieved January 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.change-management-monitor.com/articles/34-scenarios.html.

Department of the Army. (1993). A Leaders Guide To After Action Review (TC 25-20).

Dick, W., Carey, L., and Carey, J. (2000). The Systematic Design of Instruction (3^rd edition). Glenview, IL: Addison Wesley Publishing

Duch, B. (2001). Writing Problems for Deeper Understanding. In B. Duch, S. Groh, and D. Allen (Eds.). The Power of Problem-Based Learning (pp. 47-58). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Endres, C. (2003). Generic Question Stems. Retrieved December 30, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.wright.edu/ carole.endres/genericquestions.htm.

Felder, R. and Brent, R. (2004). Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction Retrieved January 21, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Resist.html.

Field-Tested Learning Assessment Guide. (2004). Concept Mapping. Retrieved January 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.flaguide.org/cat/minutepapers/conmap2.htm.

Friere, P. (1970). The Pedagogoy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.

Foundation for Critical Thinking. (2003) Socratic Teaching. Retrieved March 11, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.criticalthinking.org/university/socratict.html.

Gagne, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4^th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Gagne, R., Briggs, L., and Wager, W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4^th edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Goldsmith, M. (2004). Leave It at the Stream. Fast Company, May 2004, 103.

Grubb, N. and Associates. (1999). Honored but invisible: An inside look at community college teaching. New York: Routledge.

Hake, R. (2002). Lessons from the physics education reform effort. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 28. Online: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art28.

Hale, S. (2004). Concept Mapping. Retrieved January 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dc.peachnet.edu/ shale/humanities/composition/handouts/concept.html.

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997) Can We Believe Our Eyes? Retrieved January 8, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.learner.org/resources/series26.html.

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997) A Private Universe. Retrieved January 8, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.learner.org/resources/series28.html.

Johnson, D. and Johnson, F. (1994). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. 5^th Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson, D. and Johnson, R. (1994). Structuring Academic Controversy. In S. Sharan (Ed.). Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods (pp. 66-81). West Port, CT: Praeger.

Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology and Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.

Jonassen, D. and Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based Reasoning and Instructional Design: Using Stories to Support Pproblem Solving. Educational Technology and Research and Development, 50(2), 65-77.

Kagan, S. and Kagan, M. (1994). The Structural Approach: Six Keys to Cooperative Learning. In S. Sharan (Ed.). Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods (pp. 115-136). West Port, CT: Praeger.

Keller, J. M., (1983). Development and Use of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design (Report No. IR 014 039). Enschede, Netherlands: Twente Univ. of Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 313 001).

King, A. (1995). Guided peer questioning: A cooperative learning approach to critical thinking. Cooperative learning and college teaching, 5(2), pp. 15-19.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Kruse, K., Keil, J. (2000). Technology-based Training. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

Lanzig, J. (1997). The Concept Mapping Homepage. Retrieved January 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://users.edte.utwente.nl/lanzig/cm_home.htm.

Lave, J. and Wegner, E. (1991). Situated Learning, Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mager, R. (1997). Preparing Instructional Objectives: A Critical Tool in the Development of Effective Instruction (3^rd edition). Atlanta, GA: Center for Effective Performance.

McKeachie, W.J. (2002). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university professors. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

McKeachie, W., Chism, N., Mengies R., Svinicki, M. and Weinstein, C. (1994). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research and Theory for College and University Teachers (9th ed.). Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath and Company

Merrill, D. M. (1997). Instructional Strategies that Teach. CBT Solutions, November/December, 1-11.

Merrill, M. D. (In press). First Principles of Instruction. Educational Technology and Research and Development.

Millis, B. and Cottell, P. 1998. Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty. Westport, Connecticut: Oryx Press.

Millis, B. and Cottell, P. 2003. Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty. The Art and Craft of Teaching, 23^rd Annual Lilly Conference on College Teaching, Oxford, Ohio, November 20-23.

Nadkarni, S. (2003). Instructional Methods and Mental Models of Students: An Empirical Investigation. Academy of Learning and Education, 2(4), 335-351.

Oxford Center for Staff Development. (1995). Going Deep. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(1), 4.

Reiser, R. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part II: A History of Instructional Design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57-67.

Rowell, Katherine. (2003). Integrating Data Analysis Early into the Curriculum. The Art and Craft of Teaching, 23^rd Annual Lilly Conference on College Teaching, Oxford, Ohio, November 20-23.

Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., and Donovan, S. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1) 21-52.

Stahl, N., Simpson, M., and Hayes, C. (1992). Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk students. Journal of Developmental Education, 16(1), 2-10.

Stolovitch, Harold and Keeps, Erica. (2003). Telling Ain’t Training. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

Twigg, C. (2004). Using Asynchronous Learning in Redesign: Reaching and Retaining the At-Risk Student. Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(1), 7-15.

University of North Carolina. (2003). Developing Lesson Plans. Retrieved January 19, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ils.unc.edu/daniel/214/lesson plans.html.

University of St. Thomas. (2004). Concept- or Mind-Mapping for Learning. Retrieved January 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.iss.stthomas.edu/studyguides/mapping/.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-Centered Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wlodkowski, R. and Ginsberg, M.B. (1995). Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Young, S. and Shaw, D.G. (1999) Profiles of effective college and university teachers. Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 670-686.

Activities For Learner-Centered Teaching

Background Information

2…………………... Learner-Centered Teaching: Becoming a Lifelong Learner

3…………………... Using Active Learning Strategies in Learner-Centered Teaching

4…………………... Critical Thinking Takes Students Deeper in Their Learning

5…………………... The Importance of Reflection in Learning

6…………………... Asking Better Questions Improves Learning

7…………………... Suggestions for Using Learning Activities

8…………………... Models for Evaluating Student Performance in Learning Activities

9…………………... Index of Learning Activities Grouped by Learning Strategy

10…………………. Index of Learning Activities (Alphabetically)

Appendices

33………………… Appendix A – Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of Critical Thinking

Learner-Centered Teaching: Becoming a Lifelong Learner

Using Active Learning Strategies in Learner-Centered Teaching

Critical Thinking Takes Students Deeper in Their Learning

The Importance of Reflection in Learning

Asking Better Questions Improves Learning

Suggestions for Using Learning Activities

Learning Activities Grouped by Learning Strategy

Learning Activities Indexed Alphabetically

Question Creation………………………………………..28

Metacognition (Thinking About Thinking)

One Minute Paper / Muddiest Point

Question Creation

What, So What, Now What?

Appendix A

Appendix B

Problem-Based Learning

Appendix D

References and Additional Resources

Belum ada Komentar untuk "Activities For Learner-Centered Teaching"

Posting Komentar

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel